The assignment would have been to look for double entendre, wordplay…lexical ambiguity!…in popular music. Continue reading
The Nature article by Shahar Arzy (in Olaf Blanke’s lab) about the young woman who “felt a presence” after stimulation of the brain has made the rounds, with great discussions of the work elsewhere (“Ghost Stories” at The Frontal Cortex, “Ghost in the Machine” at The Island of Doubt) and recently at the new blog Alpha Psy. James over at the Island of Doubt connects this work to developments in neurotheology and the search for spiritual unity with some sort of god presence. Vaughn at Mindhacks has reviewed the article, too, and posted links to Blanke’s other work. The focus over at Mindhacks is the role of the temporal parietal junction (TPJ) in these delusions with an insightful question about the negative emotional content of “the other” in this patient. The upshot is that Arzy and colleagues’ research is fascinating on many levels, and provides a window into ways the self and body are bound, and how that unity unravels with brain damage or psychiatric disturbance.
My interest in the article is slightly different. Continue reading
Here’s the link to the Union of Concerned Scientists Science Idol cartoon contest. Most of them are funny, some are more artistically pleasing than others, of course…
I think of some of these MDRC coworkers and wonder where they are (or, if I know where they are, how they are doing — post a comment!).
Adele Hutchinson: Adele worked for the Aphasia Center, and I’m sure she went to grad school at Wayne State.
David Nugent: Always a deep interest in film, and it looks like he is exercising the love
Bonnie Wong: Bonnie published with members of the MDRC more than any of us. I can’t find her now…
Cate Brawn Fortier: Wow, I tell stories to students of Cate “the airpuff machine lady” and how the amnesic patients could remember her…Can’t find her now.
On another note from that era, a few of our patients were profiled in a 20/20 episode originally aired in 1997 called “Yesterday’s Gone”. A long time ago now I lost my tape of the episode, so over the past year I’ve twice requested a copy from ABC, from the department specifically charged with providing old programs. They cannot fulfill my request! What incompetence! Arrrgggghhh….
There’s so much out there recently on how to solve the “pipeline problem” of underrepresentation of women in science, and most authors agree that we must start to address the issue earlier than college (see Chad’s post at Uncertain Principles and Zuska’s response to him).
Indeed, the world is abuzz with the issue and we see news in The Chronicle about a major report today (National Academies report summary here). Lots of lovely stuff in the summary including the quote below, which lies somewhere well beyond the patently obvious for any of us who aren’t total dichotomizers:
The panel noted that, after an exhaustive review of the scientific literature, including studies of brain structure and function, it could find no evidence of “any significant biological differences between men and women in performing science and mathematics that can account for the lower representation of women,” according to its report.
Rather, the panel blamed environments that favor men, continuous questioning of women’s abilities and commitment to an academic career, and a system that claims to reward based on merit but instead rewards traits such as assertiveness that are socially less acceptable for women to possess.
I study this stuff and clearly the panel is completely on-target!
Anyway, I’m most interested in Zuska’s other post here, with real live tips (“Resources for Parents”) on keeping girls’ interest in science strong, and the comments in this thread are golden! The idea of encouraging tinkering and understanding the potential role it may play in confidence, underscored by Bill Hooker later in the comments, is fabulous…